On one hand, there's a sense of continuity - despite the changes in styles over time, each work is part of a modernist continuum, an addition to the catalog of human achievement. And there's also a legitimacy conferred - "this is like that", so it's going to be similarly good. But then fundamentally, they sound different and look different on the outside; why don't they look different on the inside?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f6e0/1f6e0ddce9a057b71174f92b7195fc367f8dfbfb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae3c8/ae3c82111941ba5938e4d554fd35ed789387e436" alt=""
"Album" (or "Cassette" or "Compact Disc" [unfortunately it's listed as "Album" on iTunes, and not "Download") exemplifies a close relationship between the cover and the label. There's no mistaking which sleeve this goes in. I love its literalism. I also particularly appreciate how the songs are subjugated to the album - on the the sleeve, the tracklisting is a small row of single words separated by commas. This object is not "Collection of Songs" or "The One with Rise" - it's "Album."
No comments:
Post a Comment